The second superseding indictment against the men of “The Order” in 1985 reads: This organization constituted an enterprise, that is, a group of individuals associated in fact for the purposes of advancing their views of “white” or “Aryan” supremacy and the political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a White or Aryan background, and of making and retaining profits for the enterprise through acts and threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property (as defined by Title 18, United States Code 1961.4).

I have read Title 18, no where in the code does it refer to “White or Aryan Supremacy.” Yet, the Department of Just-Us is threatening to keep me incarcerated another ten years, ten years beyond the court established guideline for a “mandatory two-thirds release” date for “views of white or Aryan Supremacy.” Oddly enough, views that no members of the Order held. None of us were “white supremacists,” we were white separatists. We did not believe in the concept of reigning supreme over non-white people, we wanted our own white nation, void of non-whites entirely. We were not tried, convicted, and sentenced to lengthy prison terms for our political views, which are not illegal, we were prosecuted for the violations noted in Title 18: “robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” The accusation of “white supremacy” in the indictment was merely spurious postulation. We didn’t even believe in being supreme over other whites, let alone, non-whites. The allegation of white supremacy was just window dressing to ensure that the public would interpret the event of our trial from a particular point of view, i.e. “spin”.

The term “white supremacy” is a buzzword or catchword utilized to illicit a pre-conditioned reflexive response, that is, to sway public opinion. Americans have been bombarded with propaganda daily about the evils of white supremacists of the 1900’s. Images of slavery, whippings, and lynchings of black people automatically come to mind when we hear or read the term “white supremacy.” The accusers wanted to detract from what the Order truly wanted-government reform, hence the contrivance to distort the facts. The authorities were worried that the public would side with the ideals of The Order.

The tactic of distorting the events to mold and sway public opinion has been around a long time. Whether the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” are genuine or a forgery the contrivance is true: Protocol No. 19.3, “In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crimes we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.” This is exactly what happened to the men of The Order at trial in 1985. And now, 30 years later, after serving the sentence for my “crimes,” The Department of Justice is attempting to utilize the spurious postulation of my “continued advocacy of white supremacy” to extend my sentence by 10 years.

Many labels have been used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to misrepresent me: “white supremacist” being foremost, along with “extremist, radicals,” and “anti-government.” Slanderous labels utilized to create stigma, to stain and brand me, to characterize me as something I am not in order to justify their nefarious acts and condemnation of me.

There is an old proverb that goes: Whoever digs a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him!” that is to say, the wicked will be snared by their own devices. It is ironic that all the labels with which they erroneously branded my character really are only applicable to the authorities of the United States!

According to my Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, “White Supremacy” is defined as: “A doctrine based on belief in the inherent superiority of the White race over the black race and the correlative necessity for the subordination of blacks to whites in all relationships.” I have at least a dozen “advancement denial notices,” “referral notices,” and “Notices of Action” wherein the DOJ claims that I am an advocate of white supremacy. I defied them to provide any evidence whatsoever to indicate that I ever said, wrote, or did anything to advocate white supremacy. They produced nothing, because there is nothing to produce. I am not a white supremacist, and there is not a single pro-white group in America that advocates this odious concept. The only entity that did, and covertly still does, is the national, state, and local authorities within the United States. It is the authorities, and the aristocrats from which they came and were elected that white supremacy, defined by Webster’s, is derived. It was them who allowed the institution of slavery in America, them who profited from it. It was them who considered themselves superior to blacks and other races. It was them who believed that the non-white races were inferior; and therefore, an exploitable resource. However, it was not about race as far as they themselves were concerned, they were not about racial cultivation, they were merely supremacists for their own sake and profit. They enslaved, manipulated, and exploited the “lower class”–whites as well! Blacks had nothing that the average white man wanted, the average white man was, more or less indifferent about blacks.

The terms, “extremist” and “radical” have similar definitions. “Radical”: of or relating to the origin: fundamental-marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional: tending or disposed to make extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions; of relating to or constituting a political group associated with views, practices, and policies of extreme change: advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.

“Origin, fundamental,” I interpret this to represent the foundation and basis for the beginning of our existence and the conditions thereof, that is NATURAL LAW. The definition: “Marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional” Any authority that legislates laws that are contrary to the laws established by nature, constitutes a departure from the usual or traditional, the fundamentals of mans existence.

The so-called Founding Fathers of the United States practiced a faith known as “deism” advocating “natural reusion” over time, the U.S. Government and legislators are marked by a considerable departure from the tradition! It use to be that only free white males could vote or own property; segregation was enforced by law; inter-racial marriages, homosexuality, abortion, and pornography were illegal. According to Websters definition of “radical” define the US authorities as the true “radicals.” Definition: “Advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.” I guess, with a bit of spin, the last definition could apply to me, except the retention of the previous state of affairs is beyond reconstruction or restoration. And the only advocacy on my part was to create a separate territory for a white racial imperative, a return to the natural state of affairs, the fundamentals. This could hardly be defined as “extreme measures.”

As previously noted, “radical” and “extremist” are practically synonymous terms. “Extremist”-advocacy of extreme political measures: radicalism.” So, Webster’s definitions for both terms indicate that it is the U.S. authorities who are the real radical extremists! Just because the legislators define “legality,” and are so big it lends them an air of “authority,” it does not mean they are just or legitimate. There is a greater authority, the Laws of Nature and its Creator. Laws that no authority have right to encroach upon. I advocate a reform, a return to Natural Law. I have the Faith of my Fathers before me. The laws, morals, and ethnics established by nature and learned by observance. That is the TRUE DEFINITION of “Patriotism.” From the Latin: “Pater:Father.” “Patriot (late Latin) Patriota, lineage: one who has the faith of his fathers before him and propagates his fore fathers ethics.

So, the real white supremacist, radical extremist is not me, but those who accuse me. Those that want to incarcerate me for then more years for crimes THEY COMMITTED, not me! And, regardless of what my political beliefs are, and what I advocate, according to the “Bill of Rights,” I am, as a citizen, entitled to those beliefs without fear of imprisonment for merely exercising my constitutional freedoms! Title 18 listed the “crimes” as: “threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom from being oppressed due to political views, are not listed as crimes in Title 18 United States Code 1961.4.

“Anti-government:” apparently the Department of Just-Us equates expressing verbal dissent to abuse of authority as being “anti-government.” I am not anti-government, but I am averse to injustice and inequity. Social structures are organized on the fundamental precepts of Natural Law. Any “authority” that legislates laws contrary to nature is a crime against nature and all mankind. The innate instinct to survive, to procreate and propagate is a powerful natural instinct among all organisms. Self-preservation is a fundamental law of nature, and, by extension, the protection, cultivation, and propagation of the family, tribe, race, and nation is of the utmost importance! The term “nation” is from the Latin “natio” meaning: birth, race, nation, to be born, to begat, more at KIN. “Social” is defined as: “trending to form cooperative and interdependent relationships with others of one’s kind.” A “society” is: “A voluntary association of individuals for common ends; a natural group of plants, usually of a single species; the progeny of a pair of insects when constituting a social unit (as a hive of bees).” In light of Webster’s dictionary, who is the real anti-government, anti-social entity? I defer to the superseding indictment: “The political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a white or Aryan ethnic background…” Except the authorities seem to convey the idea that we were only out for cultivation of our own kind. We must first be in a position to help ourselves before we can help others. However, I believe all mean are sovereign and should never be coerced, forced, or tricked in to doing anything against ones freewill. It is the authorities who have usurped the sovereignty of mankind……

By the usurpation of the sovereignty of the populace, America is reduced to an anomic commercialistic  pseudo society. We are all thrall born slaves today, laboring for the psychopathic personalities of a runaway bureaucratic aristocracy. REDEEM THY SELF!

Gary Lee Yarbrough

November 2014