Category: government



Gary has his parole hearing this September. We are optimistic, but we also know the reality of the tyrants that hold him in prison. They do not want to turn Gary lose because they are scared of the unity he can bring for folk…

Well, folks, if they do not parole him, both Gary and myself want to see their worst fears come true. Gary might be behind the prison walls, but I can speak for him. I have spoken for him for many years now. If Gary is not paroled, his wants the organizational lines to be broken and all of Folk stand together and protest his inhumane incarceration. Obama is freeing federal prisoners all the time but Gary Yarbrough isn’t one of them…and it is 99.9% chance that Obama doesn’t free Gary because 1. Gary is White and not a Muslim 🙂 2. Because of Gary’s beliefs. We came together once before for Gary. This time with more preparation and time, we can plan much bigger and wider area.

I will be going to see Gary in September, so I will know more then. Gary has never walked away or given up his beliefs. He has already stated that he would gladly give another 8 years for his Folk….so, Folks, if Gary is not paroled in September, it is time for us to give back to him what he gave to us.

Imagine a day in Gary Yarbrough’s life. In a very small cell, maybe let out an hour a day into a small caged rec area (if they have the available staff to take him), his communications stolen to try to keep him from writing to people, he sacrificed his family and his life. He has been in prison for 32 years. He is now a grandfather to grandchildren he has never seen. His children were just babies when he went to prison. He sacrificed basically his whole life. So, folks, it is time for us to start giving back to Gary Yarbrough. He don’t expect this. He loves Folks naturally, but me as his wife is asking this. He deserves this. He is willing to sacrifice another 8 years of his life and be almost 70 when he is released. He was 28-years-old when he went to prison. It is time for us to give back to Gary Yarbrough just a little bit of what he has given to us.

You can start by writing him. You can write him at Gary Yarbrough 09883-016, US Penitentiary Max, PO Box 8500, Florence, CO 81226-8500

I will have more details on protests and get togethers in September!

Folk, Family, Faith

Susan Yarbrough

 

 


Hello all. I just wanted to do a quick update, and I will go into more detail tomorrow when I have time. I posted not long ago about the BOP making Gary’s daughters a STG (Security Threat Group,) even though none of them are politically active in the same manner that Gary was. The hack (correctional officer) took all of Gary’s pictures of his daughters, including those of his deceased stepdaughter, Annette. Gary was heartbroken, so he called me and vented. The officer monitoring our phone call claimed that Gary threatened her…Gary DID NOT!! Gary has been locked up 23 years and knows better, and he wouldn’t threaten her anyways. He is not that type of person. But this is what the officer claims. At first, Gary was found not-guilty of the charge then all of a sudden they changed it to guilty and took away his phone privileges until November (cont, under picture)

11173410_1573876939529258_5964959525188149498_n

California

. Tomorrow, I will write why they did this. Gary did not threaten the officer, it was me he was on the phone with. He talked about how the officer had no right to do that and how they try to make things difficult for him, which they do. Additionally, they always try to affect Gary’s communications with me and everybody else. This is another means to do that. They especially want to affect my communication with Gary, since I am his voice…however, little do they know that I know him well enough to know what he would say or do in any situation. They can’t shut me up!

I got two letters from Gary, which tomorrow, when I have more time, I will post some out of each of those letters. My husband is a true warrior! No matter how they try to break him, he stands steadfast in his beliefs and faith! You, the Folk help him do this! If you have a few minutes, please write Gary! It is a very difficult time for him right now and he needs the support of the Folk that he sacrificed his life for.

But if you have a minute, please write him and show him your support at:

Gary Yarbrough #09883-016

US Penitentiary Max

PO Box 8500

Florence, CO 81226-8500

ORION,

Susan Yarbrough


Hello, everybody! I am back in action! I went through a tough time. After we finished up Gary’s legal fund, I had to deal with some legal issues myself and some family situations.

I had to go through the process of getting my grandson, whom I am raising, diagnosed with high-functioning autism. We were sitting at a red light one day, on our way to an evaluation for him, and a state trooper was sitting behind me. Next thing I know, his lights are on. Apparently, I had an unpaid speeding ticket from close to Baton Rouge from 2001 and my driver’s license had been suspended. Wow…was a shocker for me. The only thing that kept me out of jail was I had my grandson with me and nobody to pick him up. The state trooper did do that for me….but I still don’t remember the speeding ticket. It took me almost $4,000 in fines and court costs to get my driver’s license back….but wait a minute…without a driver’s license it was hard for me to travel and talk about Gary’s situation…think on that for a minute LOL.

Since my last update…Gary has been through a lot. They have declared his daughters a security threat and took his last pictures of them, including the last picture he had of Annette, his deceased stepdaughter.Additionally, none of his daughters are politically active, so how can they be a security threat? Gary called me to vent, which I was glad that was all he did. Gary is known for his temper, which has calmed down with his age and his desire to come home LOL. Gary didn’t mention the COs name that did this or threaten the CO in any way over the phone…however, the exact CO happen to be listening to our phone conversation…and put a direct threat incident report against Gary. Wow…where do they find these COs? There was no direct threat…he just told me what they CO did…did say whether it was a he or a she, made not threats toward the CO…nothing. But they are trying to push his buttons and add an incident report because it is getting close to his parole hearing. However, the law firm is on this and Gary is keeping his cool. I am so proud of my husband!!!!!!!


On March 29th at 3:00 pm CST, the ANA will be doing a “Bring Gary Yarbrough Home” telethon. This will be the first event of this type that has been done in the movement. This event will have speakers, music, and information about Gary’s situation. I will be one of the speakers. Also, I might give away a few free T-shirts to certain callers who make donations. This is going to be a fantastic event, so be sure to listen in here on March 29th!

We raised the retainer of $5,000, with still $2,600 to raise. We have raised $1,600 of that $2,600, so we don’t lack much for paying off the law firm, and they are definitely already on Gary’s case! Gary deserves this, and if we get Gary free, maybe, just maybe, the BOP and DOJ won’t hold the others passed their mandatory release.

Additionally, I will soon be joining the ANA Network with a Preservation of White Women (POWW) internet radio show, so stay tuned in to find out when that will be happening!

Thank you for all the support that has given thus far! We need to get Gary Yarbrough home!


Hello everybody! I just wanted to send a special thank you to my brothers and sisters across the big pond…wow, you guys have amazed me with what y’all have done! Additionally, this is a call for others to take a stand. If we don’t take a stand where are we going to end up. They are violating Gary Yarbrough’s constitutional rights…and are working on taking our American rights. We are losing more and more control every day.


Hello, BOP I am back. Yes, I know about the attempt on Gary’s life, and he will have an attorney….so get ready to have all your criminal and inhumane treatment of Gary exposed. So get ready to rock n roll. But I have a little word for you if you even think about hurting Gary Yarbrough anymore or making him a “sacrifice.”

Many, many people are watching to wait and see what happens, well big ole government agency, let me tell you two different possible scenarios:

1. You let Gary come home, and I stop this now. We will be quiet and live out the rest of our lives quietly. I have been with Gary for a long time and we were quiet until you did the 2014 parole vacate in 2010. Then when I found out about the mandatory release, I quieted down and went back to my quiet life….until now until you screwed him over on the mandatory release. You set him up with a social security card and had the VA come and see him, and then acted like you knew nothing about the mandatory 2/3 release date.

2. If anything happens to him at all…any more physical or mental abuse (I will talk about how they have treated Gary psychologically in another post)..I will show you LEGAL activism. If he dies, I will not just disappear. I will go to legal activism. Gary’s death will make him a martyr and bring unity, and bring back a need in people to find justice. You know as well as I do that there is much unrest right now, do you really want to tip the barrel by making Gary a martyr and making people even more angry?

You, BOP, pushed me to this point…not Gary. My husband taught me to love folk. That violence is not the way. He taught me different from hate and violence. You, BOP, are the one putting the anger and hate back in me. You are treating a human who has done 30 years (I have seen violent criminals do way less time…child molesters, rapists, murderers, etc) very illegally and inhumanly. You started the fire, so let’s play. I have nothing to lose without my husband here….Yes, I might have a child I am raising, but I know he will be well taken care of. I am getting out there as much as possible what happened to Gary, so a lot of eyes are waiting to see what happens…your call…I am waiting to see which direction I need to go.

Susan Yarbrough


Gary called me tonight, and I had been worried about him because I do hear from him on a regular basis. Gary is at Florence High and does get let out of his cell for rec, to use the computer (for legal work and to email through corrlinks but emailing is all he can do), and he stays in contact with me. I haven’t heard from him for a few days. I finally got a call tonight. Over the weekend, he had been beaten by another prisoner (with guards just a few feet away, who did nothing to stop it) until he was unconscious, and then he was tear gassed by the correctional officers while unconscious.

Gary was on the computer, fixing to email me and this other prisoner came up to Gary and told him that it was his turn on the computer. Gary told him that it wasn’t yet his turn. The prisoner then attacked Gary. The prisoner who attacked Gary was 3 times Gary’s size and half his age. It is hard for Gary to defend himself because of his arthritis. The prisoner beat Gary until he was unconscious. When Gary woke up, he realized he had been gassed while being unconscious. This was very inhumane treatment. Tear gas is meant to be used to control situations, not to use on somebody who is already unconscious.

They then put Gary in the hole without medical treatment. When he called me, he was in so much pain and having trouble breathing that he could barely talk. The beating happened on Saturday and he has been in the hole since then with not seeing one doctor. It was Tuesday night when Gary called me.

I have cried since I have gotten off the phone with Gary. Both Gary and myself know where this is going…they have always tried to break Gary, and this isn’t the first time he has been beaten severely. We know they want him dead…but here is a little word for the BOP and DOJ.

You want my husband out of the way because of the truth that he has and the fact he would never roll over or play into your little games. But you know what…when you do kill him..whether it is by medical neglect or having somebody beat him to death, he will become what you don’t want him to become…a martyr.

Yes, Gary will become a martyr once you kill him behind those walls…and you know what that will do? With all the unrest right now, a martyr, especially one who was killed off behind those walls will all that will be needed to ignite that spark that you corrupt people so dread. That will bring unity and strength to what you so hate…it will bring about what you don’t want to happen…Is this what you want? Or would you rather leave Gary alone, stop the abuse, and let him come home, and stay quietly in the background…not saying a word.

It is on you. No matter what happens to Gary, I will keep fighting. I will ALWAYS fight to show the injustice you have done to him. What are you going to do to me? Kill me to or have somebody out of a prison gang come and beat me up? I do not fear you…

I will continue after I’ve had some sleep…it is after 3am, and I am tired and stressed.


I was reading this morning about the Supreme Court trying to decide if they can use social media posts against people. This is already in the works and they are trying to start that via Gary Yarbrough. Do you realize this is the beginning of our restriction of our Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, and so many other freedoms…..When are people going to wake up and realize what they are trying to do. They are getting away with it with Gary because only a handful of people are doing anything besides talking.

What is it going to take for people to wake up and realize what is happening? They are not just violating Gary’s constitutional rights, but this will lead to the violation of our constitutional rights. One day it will come to imprisonment for something being posted about a person, when that person didn’t even posted, especially if it is a “person of interest.” Even if it does not come to this, which more than likely it will (almost like being arrested for a “thought crime”), soon they will be able to tell you what words you can or cannot put on the internet or what you can view.

I do realize that a lot of predators utilize the internet; however, parents should watch their children more carefully on the internet. That is what being a parent is all about! It means keeping your kids safe, which includes monitoring what they do on the internet. Additionally, a lot of people vent and joke at the same time, especially on social media, about wanting to “kill my wife/husband.” How many times do married couples say that in a day in person LOL. How many times do parents make joking remarks towards their children, like “I am gonna beat the tar out of you.”? But they would not actually do it, but soon these words will be able to be used against people. This will lead to other doors, which will control our Freedom of Speech even more.

This is already in the process they vacated Gary’s 2014 parole date, which was approved, based on internet posts made on public forums by other people. Gary didn’t even have internet access at Florence ADX. How can he control what people post? He can’t…and he should not be responsible for it. If the DOJ and BOP is allowed to get away with this, pretty soon we will be held accountable for things that people about us on the internet. So much for the freedoms that our forefathers fought for…we are letting them go right out the window while we sit back and do nothing. Once freedoms are gone…well…..

Time to wake up people…..

Respectfully,

Susan Yarbrough


Original Jurisdiction Appeal

August 20, 2014

Re: Appeal of Parole Hearing Conducted on July 15, 2014, “Notice of Action”

Dated August 8, 2014

#1 The Guidelines were incorrectly applied in my case: © Time in Custody:

Hearing examiner Hilton had no knowledge of my actual sentence guidelines and therefore made no recommendation. She was unaware that, as an “old law” sentenced prisoner with a sentence over 45 years, I have a court appointed two-thirds date of 30 years. That two-thirds date is exactly the same date examiner Howard set for a “presumptive parole,” and which the commission approved in 2009, being: November 23, 2014. The “Presumptive Parole Date” of November 23th, 2014 was vacated in 2010; however, the court appointed two-thirds date of November 23, 2014 has not been vacated as far as I am aware.

According to the Notice of Action for the previous parole consideration dated September 19, 2012: “The commission parole consideration dated September 19th, 2012: “The commission will conduct a record review of your case approximately 9 months prior to the two-thirds date. If a parole is not ordered as a result of the record review, the commission will conduct a hearing for you.” I was given no notice of such a hearing, nor notice of the results of such a hearing if there was a record review or hearing. Since no notice was issued, and I was not given the opportunity to be heard or appeal the results of the hearing if the two-thirds date was revoked or vacated, a decision to deny the court appointed two-thirds release date should be considered null and void.

The “Notice of Action” dated August 8, 2014 noted: “No change in 15-year reconsideration hearing in July 2024 or continue to expiration, whichever comes first.” As far as I am aware, my sentence expires on the court appointed two-thirds date of November 23, 2014. The parole commission has not justified or given a reason for continuing my incarceration beyond the 30 year November 23rd, 2014 guideline.

As noted in my letter to the commission, given to examiner Hilton, dated July 15, 2014, the sentencing court in Seattle, WA for the 60 year sentence considered all priors, the “seriousness of my offenses” including the weapons offense case in Boise, Idaho when the court set the sentence and guidelines with a two-thirds date of November 23rd, 2014. As of yet, the commission has not issued a reason, nor given me Notice of Intent to continue my incarceration beyond the November 23rd, 2014 two-thirds date. According to the September 19, 2012 Notice of Action there are two reasons to consider:

  1. “Whether there is reasonable probability that I will commit a federal, state, or local crime; or
  2. “Whether I have frequently or seriously violated the rules of the institution.”

If the commission considered these two reasons at a “review” or “conducted a hearing for me,” I was not informed, nor given any due process regarding either. As to reason #1 its ambiguity and equivocality leaves it too uncertain to even address. It is a reason that is easily abused by any authority. As to reason #2, there are aggregate guidelines to prevent abuse or authority in this respect, and, as also noted in my July 15, 2014 letter to the commission, “I am 10 years beyond any aggregate guidelines for infractions.” That said, and as noted in previous appeals, this standard is easily exploited by the Bureau of Prisons staff, who abuse their authority to manipulate and orchestrate incidences to force inmates to commit infractions. They do this all the time. A disciplinary hearing is hardly conductive to a truly adjudicatory performance. Likewise, to extend my incarceration beyond the 30 year two-thirds date by ten years utilizing the two considerations noted above, without any notice, due process, or opportunity to be heard and rebut the accusations would be a miscarriage of justice. Eighteen years about the aggregate guidelines would be extremely excessive and truculent. Even the 10 years is contrary to guidelines (I’ve had no incident reports in 8 years).

As of November 23rd, 2014 I will have served 360 (30 years) months in prison, five years more than double the original guideline lower range of 150 months.

The decision was based on erroneous information

In July 2009 Examiner Howard recommended a 5 year parole date to November 23rd, 2014. That date was approved by the commission in October 2009. Four months later the commission vacated that date and a ordered a “special reconsideration hearing” to consider “new adverse information.” After being examined by Mr. Glen, he recommended to reinstate the November 2014 parole date. The commission denied that recommendation and ordered a second reconsideration hearing for July 2010. Examiner Kubic recommended a 15 year set off of 2024. The commission “notice of action” dated January 8, 2013 claims “The commission found posts attributed to you on websites that provide a forum for expressing white supremacist, anti-Semitic, militant, and anti-government views.” I would note here that I have been in prison since before the world wide web and internet existed. I have not had access to a computer, nor never seen any websites whatsoever. I have no way of knowing who, nor what, is on any website. The commission noted that these websites provide a forum “for expressing” views. It is a complete impropriety for the commission to hold me accountable for what others express in a public forum, especially since I have never viewed that forum and have no knowledge of who or what is posted on the side. I still do not know who or what these expressed views are. The Notice of Action  goes to the note, “Your continued affiliation through the internet contradicts your claim that you have for years renounced such views.” The commission has me “affiliated” with websites, people, and expressed opinion I have never seen, met, or heard? This also is complete impropriety. The commission claims that I “renounced such views” at the 2009 parole hearing. The 2009 parole hearing was audio recorded, I never made such renunciation. I stated at the hearing that “My beliefs have changed.” My beliefs never included “white supremacy” nor “anti-government” views. Therefore, not only is there adherence to such views there is no “continued adherence to such views,” nor any “affiliation” with anyone who professes such obvious views. That is: There was absolutely no “new adverse information” to “reconsider,” and no valid reason to vacate the November 23rd, 2014 presumptive parole date. The commission did so based entirely upon misperception and misrepresentation.  In paragraph four of the January 8, 2013 Notice of Action the commission goes on to allege my “continued expression of white supremacist” and “anti-government views via the internet” AS IF I HAD EXPRESSED SUCH VIEWS MYSELF!!!!!!!! The commission is apparently attributing to me the views that others have expressed in the format of a PUBLIC forum. This is yet additional impropriety.

Returning to paragraph one of the January 8th, 2013 Notice of Action, the commission claims that “White Supremacist Documents” were seized from my home over 30 years ago. No such documents were seized, nor presented as evidence in my trials in Idaho or Washington. I submit now that no such documents of “White Supremacy” exist. The court reinterated numerous times during the trial in Seattle, Washington that we were not being not being tried for our political/religious views, but for our violations of U.S. Laws. Regarding my October 23rd, 2009 appeal to the commission, in the May 12th, 2011 Notice of Action the commission noted that I “claimed that your ideological motives for committing the offenses were irrelevant.” I never made that claim either, I merely stated that my political beliefs and motives at that time were not illegal in themselves. Indeed, my religious beliefs were entirely the motivating factor behind my offenses 30 years ago. It is those beliefs which I referred to at the 2009 parole hearing that I have changed. And those beliefs were entirely from a biblical prospective, not white supremacy nor anti-government. The commission tends to read into my actions and statements concepts that are not relevant to me. It is a miscarriage of justice that not during my 30 years of incarceration has any government agent approached me and expressed concerns about any perceived political or religious beliefs I may or may not have, until after I was approved for parole in 2009. This seems to suggest a malicious intent. The commission will jump to wrong conclusions about my character and beliefs, but not make a single inquiry into what I actually believe?

This seems to suggest a malicious intent. The commission will jump to wrong conclusions about my character and beliefs, but not make a single inquiry into what I actually believe? Indeed, on numerous occasions I attempted to discuss my political/religious views with federal bureau of prison agents. Fifteen years ago I made a request to the psychologist, program coordinator Dr Ahrens requesting therapy with a “specialist” deprogrammer regarding my beliefs. (This request is noted in a memo from Dr. Ahrens to unit manager Adelsberger dated March 9, 2001. See Central File). I made this request so that my personal beliefs would be clarified and documented. I again requested counseling in July 2011 to Dr. Zahn and Dr. Koch to discuss the very concerns the commission raised, though those concerns are purely conjecture; my request went unanswered…….I made another attempt at counseling in a request to unit case manager, Mr. Fenlon, in written format dated March 18th, 2012. Again, no response, nor to a follow up request dated April 25th, 2012. It is inequitable for the commission to adversely judge me concerning my beliefs when the commission does not know what my beliefs consist of. I would also note that in 30 years of custody that I have no incidence of a racist nature, and no “white supremacist” prison gang activity. In fact, the Federal Bureau of prison staff has placed a “separations” order on me because I refused to allow a prominent white prison gang to force me to get involved in a prison “racial war”! My actions back up my words and dispel the accusations of the commission. I have had this separation since 1998. Since the commission had issues with websites, and sent me the disclosure material related to those sites in 2010, my wife threatened local action against those sites to force them to remove any and all mention of my name. Those disclosures were the first time I became aware of the contents of the website. Two refused to remove mention of me. There is nothing I can do about that. None of these people or websites are “affiliates” of mine. It is difficult to alter one’s past, and it takes considerable time to modify core beliefs. However, I never advocated white supremacy, racism, or anti-government views. I was, at one time, passionate about government reform. The commission should bear in mind that “The Order” was made up of men with a wide range of political and religious views. The description the government and commission note regarding The Order in the Notice of Action is untenable, the concepts of “Nazism,” “White Supremacy,” and a “White Christian Nation” are not ideologies that are compatible. This was not the objective of the Order nor was it a goal to “topple the U.S. Government.” Such a statement is purely sensationalism and hyperbole. Catch words to illicit an automatic programed reaction. Appeals are allegedly “decided on the basis of the written record.” But quite often that written record is simply an exaggerated distortion, as I believe I have demonstrated in this appeal utilizing only the Notices of Action. Perception must not be reality, reality stands on its own merits, good or bad. I have been fabricated into something I am not.

Co-defendant disparity

Also noted under appeal reason #4 the decision was based on erroneous information and the facts justify a different decision; and appeal reason #5 incorrect procedure;

Further errors and impropriety in the January 8th, 2013 Notice of Action: which notes that “Your co-defendants were not considered advocates of white supremacy.” I alleged co-defendant disparity because the commission claimed I was a white supremacist advocate. “You acted to advance the Neo-Nazi objectives of a paramilitary white supremacist organization.” (i.e. The Order). All co-defendants were members of the Order. According to court records, Richard Kemp was a “founding member.” Kemp was charged in the death of Walter West as an act of racketeering associated with the Order, he was paroled in 2008. Frank Silva, Randall Evans, and Andrew Barnhill are alleged to be Klu Klux Klansmen. All three are out on parole. I have never advocated white supremacy nor accused of any act in which someone was physically harmed. And yet the commission utilizes the claim of “white supremacy” in conjunction with membership in the Order to vacate the November 23rd, 2014 parole date. It is evident tht the commission utilizes a double standard wherein I am concerned. How is the label of “white supremacy” applicable to me, yet not to my co-defendants? The claim of “white supremacy” in the Notice is erroneous, and by associating this accusation to me and not the affore mentioned co-defendants is wrong reasoning and procedure. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that I ever advocated white supremacy or the “toppling of the U.S. Government.” Expressing dissenting opinion and views does not equate to being anti-government. And the commission is wrong to equate me to the views and opinions of others noted in a PUBLIC FORUM.  The paroled Co-defendants are noted as having blogs on the very same websites in the disclosure material provided by the commission to claim I am “affiliated” with. This is complete impropriety. Additionally, the court made no charges as to religious or political beliefs, there charges were only violation of U.S. Laws. If the commission distinguishes one defendant from the others in regard to political views, then that same standard should justly apply to all defendants. How is it that I am accused of being a “white supremacist,” adversely decided against, and denied parole as a results of that accusation while “co-defendants,” alleged members of the same enterprise are “not considered advocates of white supremacy”? The April 1985 issue of “California Magazine” Page 97 shows a photograph of 8 individuals holding a KKK banner, two of those individuals are Frank Silva and Randall Evans at a “white power” gathering. The commission does not consider these two co-defendants, noted as “Klansmen,” as advocates of white supremacy but consider me, someone who has never believed in nor advocated such a concept, a white supremacist? These two are paroled, but I am labeled a white supremacist, and as a result of that label my sentence is extended by ten years? This is totally improper disparity counter to the goals of the sentencing guidelines. I am not “anti-government,”I do express verbal dissent to abuse of authority and injustice, which is a constitutional right of free speech, as is freedom of the press or media, and the right to be free from oppression due to political and religious beliefs.

Salient Factor Score

The Salient Factor score is 5, which does not indicate a “serious threat” or the probability that I will reoffend if released.” I have no “public safety factor” classification. Indeed, the Department of Justice offered to release me in 1994 if I would “cooperate” in the conviction of Robert Miles for a crime department of justice agents knew full well that Mr. Miles was innocent of. I was not “too dangerous to release” in 1994. And the Department of Justice has offered deals for downward departures twice since then on cases involving prison gangs. I refused.

For the parole commission to claim I advocate white supremacy utilizing the exaggerated claim of website “affiliation”. To suggest that I may not obey federal, state, and local laws is injudicious and exaggerated trepidation. As previously noted, the beliefs I held 30 years ago, which led to my offenses have changed.

Especially mitigation circumstances justify a different decision:

“The Order” was made up of men with beliefs of varying degrees, none advocated the “Neo-Nazi” or “White Supremacy” concepts. None of us participated in the RICO trial 30 years ago, and none refuted the government’s charges or claims. The claims of white supremacy and anti-government sentiments were purely exaggerated sensationalism. At the time, we were “separatists” not supremacists. We did not believe any one race was superior or inferior to any other race, we simply believed we were all different. We sought to preserve and cultivate our own racial heritage, nothing more. We were tried for our violations of U.S. Law. Trying 10 men altogether, regardless of legal justification, is a miscarriage of justice. The court claimed the Order was a well organized enterprise, but in reality nothing could be further from the truth. Men committed offenses entirely on their own, act I had no knowledge of or participation in. The court considered my own offense behavior in determining the sentence. Those guidelines mandate a two-thirds mandatory release date of November 23rd, 2014, which is more than double the lower guideline range. I’ve done 20 years for my co-defendants offense behavior. That should be satisfaction enough for anyone.

A More Light Decision Should Be Rendered on Grounds of Compassion

I committed my offenses as a young man at age 28, I am now 59 and in very ill health. I have severe Rheumatoid Arthritis, Liver Disease, Thyroid Disease, and COPD. My wife is ill also and currently on disability income. After the 2014 parole date was approved she adopted two children (One being her grandson) for us both to raise. Since the 2014 date was later vacated that means my wife is forced to raise the children alone. She needs help. I will not survive a 10 year set off for parole. I am also a father and a grandfather to 7 grandchildren. I have never seen because of distance and expense. I would like to see them and spend what remaining days I have left in life to enjoy my family.

For all the above noted reasons I do humbly request parole release at the earliest possible date. I have age and educated myself, improved my character and bettered myself. I am remorseful for all my offenses.

Thank you for your consideration.

Gary L. Yarbrough

August 20th, 2014


Today, I need an internet podcast with The Free American, and as expected there were technical issues from the get go LOL Then Gary called in the middle of the show and I had to hang up with the show for a few.

Sunday at 8:00 PM EST, I will being doing Racist Radio. Before you judge, you have to know it is the “authorities” who gave us the terms “white supremacists” and “racist.” There really is no such word. It was made up by the authorities to label us and to divide. We have a right to freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and to protect our culture and heritage. All other races are not labeled for doing this. I hate nobody and I don’t look at myself better than anybody else. The only things I want are: to be able to say what I want (I have to put up with being called names because I believe the “old” way of morals and standards but I can’t voice my opinion and beliefs), to be able to associate with whoever I want to, to protect my heritage and culture, and to get my husband home! Does that make me a “racist”?

So listen to the interview I have already done and to the one Sunday!